So the letter Bob Jones wrote to President Bush congratulating him on another four years is no longer available on the Bob Jones University site. I can't imagine why; the portion I read was certainly compelling:

In your re-election, God has graciously granted America -- though she doesn't deserve it -- a reprieve from the agenda of paganism*. You have been given a mandate. We the people expect your voice to be like the clear and certain sound of a trumpet. Because you seek the Lord daily, we who know the Lord will follow that kind of voice eagerly.

Don't equivocate. Put your agenda on the front burner and let it boil. You owe the liberals nothing. They despise you because they despise your Christ. Honor the Lord, and He will honor you.

I'm just sorry I couldn't see the part that, according to reports, pushed the President to:

[A]ppoint many conservative judges and exercise forceful leadership with the Congress in passing legislation that is defined by biblical norm regarding the family, sexuality, sanctity of life, religious freedom, freedom of speech and limited government. [emphasis mine]

You will remember Bob Jones University as the one that banned interracial dating until after the year 2000; there was something of a flap about it during the 2000 campaign, but Bush defended the visit. Bob Jones University also hates Catholics, what with us doing "the work of the devil" and all. So I'm thinking that maybe, conversations between Bush and the cardinals who were all about endorsing him might be a little strained. Good thing there's always that turning-the-other-cheek policy!

http://schmeiser.typepad.com/the_rage_diaries/2004 /11/like_the_clear_.html" title="http://schmeiser.typepad.com/the_rage_diaries/2004 /11/like_the_clear_.html" target="_blank"http://schmeiser.typepad.com/...

This is going to be short correction of aww blog.

Aww blog says iraq is 90 percent stable and 10 percent unstable and attacks happen in the same area.  Well aww here is a map of al-anbar province, attacks happen often with in the al-anbar province, and as your blog says the attacks happen in the same place.  According to your blog 10 percent of iraq unstable.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Anbar" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Anbar" target="_blank"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

The entire country of iraq is Area: 168,753 sq mi (437,072 sq km)http://www.infoplease.com/ipa... Al-anbar province alone is 138,501 sq km http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/2004/09/fog-of-war-ne w-york-times-reports-that .html" title="http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/2004/09/fog-of-war-ne w-york-times-reports-that .html" target="_blank"http://belmontclub.blogspot.c... I don't know 138,501 sq km of 437,072 sq km is 10 percent of the country. Al-anbar is not the only part of the country that has attacks often. Bagdad, mosul are also in the headlines.  But I am to lazy right now to look up those numbers.  As you know the Mosul area supposedly the new safe heaven for the iraqi fighters, Mosul is not al-anbar province.  More soliders die with in al-anabar province then any other province in Iraq. 

The table below shows how many attacks happen per province. Scroll down to see the table.  Cut and paste did work out right.

The world banks are moving away from U.S. securities and starting to invest in eurozone.  This move by the world banks will make the Bush house job harder to control the U.S. deficit.  This means that the bush team will cut the domestic budgets rather then increase taxes to make up for the short of overseas investments from the world banks.  Who knows if the bush teams fuck the world attitude and growing anti-america n setiment will play a factor, in any future decisions by the world banks.

"Any rebalancing of central bank reserve portfolios has serious implications for the global financial system as the US has become increasingly dependent on official flows of funds to finance its current account deficit, estimated at $650bn in 2004" http://news.ft.com/cms/s/9ef63678-6d7d-1 1d9-9b69-00000e2511c8.html" title="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/9ef63678-6d7d-1 1d9-9b69-00000e2511c8.html" target="_blank"http://news.ft.com/cms/s/9ef6... If there is major loss in oversea's investment america is going to be in major econmic trouble. 

A few years back George Bush told the terrorrist to bring it on.  Telling the the terrorrist if you want me, come get me?  But,yesterday George Bush was hiding behind protective sheild.  What kind of person tells your opponenet to bring it, and yet you hide behind your personal security force? A coward.  Well I think he is coward, rides in the limo till he is few steps away from the capital, Then he gets out and walks where the security is the most secure.  

Well maybe Bush ment the term bring em on, was to tell the terrorist to bring there war on to the solider's in Iraq, and not try and come and get him. It depends how you personally interpet it. My personal opinion if you to tell someone to bring it, you are issuing a challenge to the person you are addressing. Which now become's your opponent,  an example would be football. When defeniveback tell the receiver to bring it on.  Lets see if you can make a play on me.   

Seems to me this president can the tell the terrorist to bring it on. Telling the terrorrist yeah bring it on to our troops or him. But when the president is mostly likely to be in harm's way, the so called bring em on president hide's behind a personal security force made up 13,000 people.   

Wow, what a brave guy? If you tell the the terrorist to bring em on, and imply that you are not afraid.  So called brave man, you should have walk further from the capital instead of just taking a few steps. So called brave man show the world that you really tough instead of using tough talk, place yourself in danger, by walking to the capital for you ignauration, instead  riding in  ;a bomb proof,and bullet proof limo on your way to capital, and hiding behind bullet proof glass in the stands. 

Like I said in my earlier blogs, anybody can act all tough and or create an image that you are tough.  But when you start to experience danger&nb sp;directly, and then you hide behind what I mention above. What kind of message does that send to people who see and hear you talk all tough?   & nbsp;   

Parents always talk about their rebellious children.  Religious parents teach their children to obey their parents it is written in the bible.   Well children of very religious parents, next time your mom and dad says the bible tells you to obey parents and stop your rebellious attitude toward your parents.  You can tell mom and dad, to read Luke 14:26.  Then you can say well mom and dad you say the bible tells to obey you, but this qoute in the bible tells me it's ok to hate you, and I am only doing what you taught me to do follow the word of the bible.

Luke 14:26 "If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters–yes, even his own life–he cannot be my disciple."