After reading the transcript of the current osama tape.  Osama mentions Bush along with certain things that bush has done within the four years of his presidency.  Which the so- called american liberal media has failed to mention in their reports. 

This statement by Osama is very intresting "Despite entering the fourth year after Sept. 11, Bush is still deceiving you and hiding the truth from you and therefore the reasons are still there to repeat what happened (with new attacks)," Bin Laden added. I want to know what binliden knows, and what truth about 9/11 osama thinks Bush is hiding from the American people? 

Second statement by Osama. This statement I think is suggestive expecially the part of the gave the hijackers time."Bin Laden also said that Bush's reaction toward the Sept. 11 attacks was slow which Bin Laden also said that Bush's reaction toward the Sept. 11 attacks was slow which gave the hijackers the time they needed to carry out the attacks.  Osama seems to hint the Bush team had somekind of prior knowledge about 9/11 and chose to react slow.   The second part of this statment further reinforces the prior knowledge theory.  "It never occurred to us that the commander-in-chief of the American armed forces would leave 50,000 of his citizens in the two towers to face these horrors alone" 

Third statement by Osama ""It appeared to him (Bush) that a little girl's talk about her goat and its butting was more important than the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers. That gave us three times the required time to carry out the operations, thank God," he said.

This statement by Osama makes me wonder. Aparently Osam a thinks that bush at the time was concerned about reading a book to school chirldren, When bush was informed that the first plane hit the tower maybe bush would have reacted more appropriately if the prior knowledge of 9/11 was available.  This not giving the hijackers the more time to carry out the attacks.  Apparently bush delayed response allowed more op erational time to carry out the attack. According to Osama the hi-jackers gained three times the time that they need to carry out there attacks.  This statement means the hi-jackers did multiple dry runs of the planed operation&nbs p;they were able to note the exact amount of time that was needed to excute their plan.  The required time to excute the plan was 20 minutes.  "We had agreed with the overall commander Mohammed Atta (who led the Sept 11. suicide plane hijackers), may God rest his soul, to carry out all operations in 20 minutes before Bush and his administration take notice," he said. "

Fourth statement by Osama. "Your security is not in the hands of (Democratic candidate John) Kerry or Bush or Al Qaeda. Your security is in your own hands," bin Laden said"  The question is why would American citzens look to al-qadea for security? 

This seems odd why would Osama say this to the American people. Maybe its a message to the sleepers within america or are targeting America.

Fifth Statement by Osama "Bin Laden accused President Bush of "misleading" the American people since the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon."  What does Osama know that he thinks is deceiving leadership by bush that has mislead the American people.

Link for entire transcript http://www.aljazeera.com/email1.asp" title="http://www.aljazeera.com/email1.asp" target="_blank"http://www.aljazeera.com/emai...

Today I took advantage of early voting in my state.  The odd part for me was that I had to vote for a trustee for the office of Hawaiian affairs.  In the past only individuals with Hawaiian blood were allowed to vote for the for the office of Hawaiian aff airs.  On the ballot were individuals with Hawaiian names and whites names.  I voted for those with Hawaiian names.  I did not want to vote of anyone with a white name who was on the ballot as a trusteee for the office of Hawaiian affairs.   

A few years back some white guy failed a law suit claiming that all citzens not only those with Hawaiian blood should be allowed to vote or run for the office of Hawaiian affairs.  When this white guy won his law suit. The extreme elements with in the Hawaiian sovereignty movement.  Protested and told the white guy and white residents within Hawaii. That it was America that overthrow the Hawaiian government and annexed Hawaii.  Now when the Hawaiian's have a opportunity to run there own affairs once agian here comes the white Americans  ;trying to tell them what to do.   What this has done is pushed more Hawaiians towards te extreme elements of the soverignty movement Some of these sovereignty movement practice the bush doctrine. "Where Bush told the world that America will make no distinicition between those terrorrist who attack America and the states the harbor them."  There groups with in Hawaii that want to decleare independence from America.  Thankfully there are moderate sovereingnty goups that offer an alternative choice to the extreme sovereignty movements.

There are some groups with-in the movement that harrass all white people for the crime of the one white guy.  Which is wrong these extreme elements should harass the guy who challenge there right to run there own affairs.  Some of the white residents with-in Hawaii sympathize with the Hawaiians that their Hawaiian government has been overthrown by America and annexed by America. Now there some white people who don't deserved to be harass that are now being harassed by some elements with the soverignty movement. 

Recently I found this site,  Some info about 9/11 you never seen in the so-called liberal media.( its not a liberal media its conservative )  It's a four part series. 

 link http://www.gnn.tv/videos/viewer.php?id=22&" title="http://www.gnn.tv/videos/viewer.php?id=22&" target="_blank"http://www.gnn.tv/videos/view...;spd=hi

Right now this link for the video is operational.  The other links have been shut down.  I don't know how long this link will be operational before right  pressure shuts this site down.

http://www.gnn.tv/content/eminem_mosh.html" title="http://www.gnn.tv/content/eminem_mosh.html" target="_blank"http://www.gnn.tv/content/emi...

The Air Force in 2002 suspended a lieutenant colonel who wrote a letter to The Herald in Monterey County, Calif., in which he ridiculed President Bush for his response to terrorism, accusing him of allowing the Sept. 11 attacks to happen because "his presidency was going nowhere."

Lt. Col. Steve Butler said of Bush: "His daddy had Saddam and he needed Osama. ... This guy is a joke."

"Even though there is nothing in the law that prevents military families from speaking out, it's certainly in the code, or culture," she said from her home city of Boston. "That code basically says, in order to support the troops, you must support whatever activity they've been sent to engage in."

Family members sometimes have been contacted by the commanding officer of a service member and told they are disloyal or called "traitors" for speaking out against the Iraq war.

WilliamCole http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2004/Oct/24/l n/ln20p.html" title="http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2004/Oct/24/l n/ln20p.html" target="_blank"http://the.honoluluadvertiser... 

Flips flops are a sllippers, sandals, whatever you want to call them to mainland people.  But peop le from other countries refer to them as go fowards for white people.   These people call them go fowards becuase when white people wear them, if the americans  start to walk backwards the flip flops come off there feet.  Some foreign guy at the mall told me. 

I seen on the news that the American military are on the offensive in fallajuh.  I think that is done to get the al-zarqi he is supposed to hiding out in fallajuh.  I also think the order to attack fallajuh came from the white house.  Becuase Bush lost the debate last night.  The bush team needs some good news,  going after al-zarqi and capturing him may be an easy win for the bush team, and a temporary fix for the ground lost for bush by the debates.  It just seems kind of odd that the Bush team let the people of fallajuh do what they want to all this time.  Then all of sudden attack them.  Why has'nt the green light been given eariler in the year.  When fallajuh was allready under seige.  The months that have past allow ed the people of fallajuh to fortify there defensive postions, originzed their fighters. Bring in more weapons to continue the fight.  Just have to wait and see the outcome of this offensive.  If its an American victory, or defeat that has to yet be determined.  But the spin by the white house could be very interesting.   

The computer for my honda car is shot, I thought  my cap and rotor needed to be replaced which I changed. Then I changed my enti re distributor, bought new spark plugs.  Now four weeks haved passed and I have been trying to find a replacement computer.  The dealer is going to charge to 1000 dollars for a new one.  But I am not going to spend a 1000 dollars for a new computer.  Now I have to go to junk yard to find one.  Honda civics when they break they really break.

Recently I have been tired of hearing 30 countries in Bush jr gulf war and 34 countries in Bush sr gulf war.  What are they really trying to compare. The number of countries that are for the Bush jr war may be similar in numbers.  But in actual combat trooop help the differ greatly.    

The first gulf war ( Bush Sr ) the following countries sent combat troops. " The U.N. coalition's forces included troops and equipment from Great Britain, France, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, Canada, Italy, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, U.S. http://www.veteranmuseum.org/...; Bush Jr gulf war the following countries sent combat troops Australia: Sent 2,000-strong force of elite SAS troops, fighter jets and warships to the Gulf Netherlands:  A few hundred Dutch troops are stationed in Turkey to operate three Patriot missile defense systems, allowing movement of U.S. troops and supplies from Germany through the Netherlands en route to the Persian Gulf. 

Poland: To deploy up to 200 troops in the Gulf region, which will perform an unspecified non-combat role, supporting the U.S.-led offensive. A few dozen Grom elite commando troops and transport ship already stationed in the Gulf area, as part of the Afghanistan campaign, could be enlisted. Spain: Strongest ally of the United States and Britain. Promised use of its NATO bases for a strike on Iraq. Spain will send a medical support vessel equipped with nuclear, biological and chemical treatment facilities. A frigate and 900 troops will accompany the support vessel in the event of a conflict.

United Arab Emirates: Base for U.S. reconnaissance aircraft and refueling; host to an estimated 3,000 western troops. Has pledged 4,000 troops supported by Apache attack helicopters, Leclerc tanks, BMP3 amphibious armored vehicles, a missile boat and a frigate to defend Kuwait in case of war in Iraq.    

United Kingdom: Washington's chief ally on Iraq has sent or committed 45,000 military personnel, planes and warships and the United States 134,000.  http://www.heritage.org/Research/MiddleEast/w m225.cfm" title="http://www.heritage.org/Research/MiddleEast/w m225.cfm" target="_blank"http://www.heritage.org/Resea...

There was 11 countries that sent combat troops to fight in gulf war 1.  In gulf war 2 there are 6 countires at the start but Spain and Philippines left so now there are only 4 countries that have combat troops in gulf war 2. 

Now when I hear people say oh the coutries that support the war are about the same.  There is no big difference in gulf war and gulf war 2.  These people I think never been in a fight in there entire life.  This is the way I look at it. Iraq couple million people, of the couple million people how many of them have hostile intent towards american soldiers, no one knows the answer.  American forces about 143, 000 troops.  

As someone who has been in fights when younger and as adult.  You don't go and fight a group of people who number 30 and you only have five people to help you.  This is my problem with these people who say oh there is 30 countries that support the U.S.  Yeah 30 countries but only 5 countires sent troops to help in the fight. The other 25 is cheerleaders or spectators what ever you want to call them.  They are'nt doing any of the fighting.

I like to equate this as myself and 30 of my friends who have been fights go out and look for a fight with someone who has about 30 friends too.  But of this guys thirty friends only five will actually help him in the fight.  This is they way I look at it America wanted a fight and brought 30 guys to fight, but only five of Americas friends will actually help America in fight.   

Or another one of my examples is the worst person to fight is someone who has nothing to lose.  This is the way I look at married couple gets divorced wife takes everything ( house, car, kids , income)  away from husband.  Husband goes out kills wife.  Why does husband do that becuase he has nothing to lose. 

Iraqi people under saddam, life is hard, hardly fresh, water, food, electric power, high crime maybe repeat victims of crimes,  women raped, people executed, high unemployment.  Amercan troops occuppy Iraq, life still hard, hardly any fresh water, food available, electiric power intertiment, high crime rate kids get kidnapped pay ransom,  women get raped, iraqi people get killed by American troops or iraqi themeselves.  American troops troops bomb homes, set up check points, kill your family, humiliate&nb sp;you and your faith.  Iraqi citizen under the right social and psyc hological conditions ( pressures ) have nothing to lose.  Iraqi citzen now becomes part of the restistance.