Early in the year of 2004 the GOP wanted to ban outlaw, make illegal gay marriage.  "President Bush has come out in favor of amending the United States Constitution to make marriage legally defined as only between one man and one woman. This would ban gay and lesbian couples from marrying and quite possibly could do away with civil unions and partner benefits." http://lesbianlife.about.com/cs/wedding/a/Amendmen t.htm" title="http://lesbianlife.about.com/cs/wedding/a/Amendmen t.htm" target="_blank"http://lesbianlife.about.com/... Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution or the constitution of any state, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups. 

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Efforts to pass a constitutional amendment that would effectively ban same-sex marriage failed in the Senate Wednesday afternoon, but supporters vowed to keep fighting for the measure. The White House released a statement from President Bush in which he said he was "disappointed" that the amendment was "temporarily blocked" in the Senate and urged the House to take up the matter.http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/1 4/samesex.marriage/" title="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/1 4/samesex.marriage/" target="_blank"http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPO...

Now all of a sudden before the GOP convention starts the GOP comes out with Cheney remarks on gay marriage " Mr Cheney was addressing a campaign audience in Iowa that included his daughter, Mary, who is openly lesbian. He said the issue of legalizing gay unions should be settled by individual states rather than by Washington."  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3596732.stm" title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3596732.stm" target="_blank"http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/am... Then we have Laura Bush saying this "It's something people should talk about and debate," Mrs. Bush said. She said Congress could be an appropriate place for that debate to begin, but she refused to say that she supported passage of the proposed constitutional amendment that her husband endorsed earlier this year" http://www.boston.com/news/specials/gay_mar riage/articles/2004/05/20 /mrs_bush_welcomes_gay_is sues_debate/" title="http://www.boston.com/news/specials/gay_mar riage/articles/2004/05/20 /mrs_bush_welcomes_gay_is sues_debate/" target="_blank"http://www.boston.com/news/sp...

Early this year the GOP was introduceing all of these bills on banning gay marriage.  Now all of sudden is GOP becomeing more moderate on this gay marriage issue?  In the begining of year the GOP were hawks on the gay marriage issue.  Now they GOP is moderates.  What happen to the true extremist face of the GOP,  Why are they trying to be moderates?

One of my friends friend is single.  She is a hot hapa haole girl, for those of you that don't know that hapa is.  Hapa is mix between white person and asian person.  The female on my blog is hapa.  Here is link if you want know what hapa haole can look like " http://lightbox7.com/" title="http://lightbox7.com/" target="_blank"http://lightbox7.com/~hapacrap/2494/page2.html" 

But anyways back to my story.  The girl is young 21 years old. She turns alot of heads whereever she goes, and a lot of guys are trying to get with her.  But since she is hot she gets to pick the from the liter of guy purseing her.  The hard part is?  The hot hapa haole girl is a jesus freak.  For non-relgious guys to get with her is going to be hard or nearly impossible.  But I wish them the best of luck.  There is nothing like walking into a party with a hot girl on your arm and all the guys stare at her.  Make the guy feel like a king,  I myself find her very attractive, if I was a few years younger I would try and purse her also.  But unforunatly I am not.  If I knew that i was going to meet this girl later on in my life. I wish I could have been born later so then I could try and purse her also.  But since I am older then her that is out of the question.  I don't want to labal as a cradle robber.  But anyways I await hearing how many guys she has turned down since she is single. I want to hear about what kind of stupid things guys will do for her just to date her.   

At the gop the republicans will announce the capture of Iraq most wanted man Abu Musab Zarqawi.  If this is true the repulbicans will use this card to great advantage.  This news was found on an al-jazerra website.  But the American media has not followed up on the story.  Maybe the American media was instructed by the bush people not to air the Zarqawi story if it is is true.  The republicans would rather announce the capture of Zarqawi at the convention. This would create a big bounce at republican convention for the war on terror platform.   However Zarqawi is a middle guy, he is not as big as osama,  But the repulbicans will inflate Zarqawi image as if he is a person of significant importance in the war on terror. 

Zarqawi has taken claim for the UN bombing in Iraq, sucide bombings againist the iraqi people along with attacks on US soliders.  The beheading of Nick Berg.  If Zarqawi capture is true?  Then the gop has a trump card at the convention.   However Zarqawi has a deputy that will replace him.  When this happens America will be back at fighting the same chess match but with a new player.  That new player will be Zarqawi replacement? 

The report claimed that the man was captured during a joint operation by U.S. occupation forces and Iraqi police, Al Siyasah newspaper, quoting Iraqi sources, said Friday.

It also said that the suspect was caught in a white shirt and jeans, and he gave no resistance when he realized his hideout was besieged, according to Iraqi police.

The U.S. and Iraqi investigators are trying to identify the captive and has sent his DNA sample for testing, the unconfirmed report indicated.

Zarqawi is the most wanted suspect in Iraq and has a U.S. bounty of $25 million on his head. http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=2955" title="http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=2955" target="_blank"http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-...

At the gop the republicans will announce the capture of Iraq most wanted man Abu Musab Zarqawi.  If this is true the repulbicans will use this card to great advantage. However Zarqawi is middle guy, he is not as big as osama,  But the repulbicans will inflate Zarqawi importance in the war on terror like the dam oil prices.  Zarqawi has taken claim for the UN bombing in Iraq, sucide bombings againist the iraqi people along with attacks on US soliders.  The beheading of Nick Berg.  If Zarqa wi capture is true?  Then the gop has a trump card at the convention.   However Zarqawi has a deputy that will replace him.  When this happens America  ;will be back at fighting the same chess match but with a new player.  That new player will be Zarqawi replacement? 

The report claimed that the man was captured during a joint operation by U.S. occupation forces and Iraqi police, Al Siyasah newspaper, quoting Iraqi sources, said Friday.

It also said that the suspect was caught in a white shirt and jeans, and he gave no resistance when he realized his hideout was besieged, according to Iraqi police.

The U.S. and Iraqi investigators are trying to identify the captive and has sent his DNA sample for testing, the unconfirmed report indicated.

Zarqawi is the most wanted suspect in Iraq and has a U.S. bounty of $25 million on his head. http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=2955" title="http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=2955" target="_blank"http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-...

Why is the governmet trying to stop the canadian drugs from going over the border.  Becuase the Canadian drugs cannot be deemed safe for the American consumer.  But yet the mexican truck drivers can crossover into American with unsafe trucks,  The mexican standard for the rigs are not as strict as the American standards.

The drugs companies stand the most to lose if purchaseing of canadian drugs become legal.  The drugs companies have donated " $44 million in Drug Company donations to Republicans since 2000
Return: $139 billion in additional Drug Company profits over 8 years
Percent Return: 315,900% " http://billionairesforbus h.com/candidate_medicare.php" title="http://billionairesforbus h.com/candidate_medicare.php" target="_blank"http://billionairesforbus h.co...

The government wants the people to insure the american drug companies make money.  There excuse if canadian drugs are not safe.

But yet the unsafe mexican truck drivers, are free to do what they want.

• Drug and human trafficking are expected to spike to unprecedented levels once the trucks begin to roll. This administration has yet to address how a more relaxed trucking policy will affect the flow of contraband and illegal immigration into the U.S.

What about the terrorist they could hitch a ride to america through the mexican truck pipeline.

• Safety concerns and, more recently, environmental issues have been the pretext for discriminatory practices towards the Mexican shipping industry.
http://www.americas.org/item_15874" title="http://www.americas.org/item_15874" target="_blank"http://www.americas.org/item_...

Well it appears that the GOP is back to its tricks again in Forida.  The state police in florida haveing been going to elderly black people's home, and interrogateing them for voter fraud in the orlando mayoral race,  "The officers, from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, which reports to Gov. Jeb Bush, say they are investigating allegations of voter fraud that came up during the Orlando mayoral election in March.

State police officers have gone into the homes of elderly black voters in Orlando and interrogated them as part of an odd "investigation" that has frightened many voters, intimidated elderly volunteers and thrown a chill over efforts to get out the black vote in November.  Officials refused to discuss details of the investigation, other than to say that absentee ballots are involved. They said they had no idea when the investigation might end, and acknowledged that it may continue right through the presidential election.

"We did a preliminary inquiry into those allegations and then we concluded that there was enough evidence to follow through with a full criminal investigation," said Geo Morales, a spokesman for the Department of Law Enforcement.

The state police officers, armed and in plain clothes, have questioned dozens of voters in their homes. Some of those questioned have been volunteers in get-out-the-vote campaigns."  http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0" title="http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0" target="_blank"http://www.spiegel.de/politik...,1518,druck-313458,00.html

Not surprisingly, many of the elderly black voters who found themselves face to face with state police officers in Orlando are members of the Orlando League of Voters, which has been very successful in mobilizing the city's black vote.

Florida is a state that's very much in play in the presidential election, with some polls showing John Kerry in the lead. A heavy-handed state police investigation that throws a blanket of fear over thousands of black voters can only help President Bush.

The long and ugly tradition of suppressing the black vote is alive   and thriving in the Sunshine State ( aka the whites only vote state ) 

Has the American economy really been good.  Well according to the cenus bureau, "3 million more Americans in poverty. Ranks of uninsured grow by 1.4 million, Census Bureau says"  Now according to bush America has turned a corner but what corner did America turn if more American people are living in poverty, also there are new additions to the growing uninsured Americans.  "The number of people living in poverty rose by 1.3 million to 35.9 million people, or 12.5 percent of the population, up from 12.1 percent in 2002. the Census Bureau said the number of Americans without health insurance coverage rose to 45 million or 15.6 percent of the population, up 1.4 million from 2002, when 15.2 percent of the population was uninsured "

"The center's analysis of the census figures found that the number of people living in extreme poverty, with incomes of less than half the poverty threshold, jumped by by 1.2 million to 15.3 million people. And the group said the share of national income going to the bottom 20 percent of the population fell to the lowest level since the government began collecting the data in 1967."  I wonder how are American citzens living in the year 2004 on 1967 wages? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5829707/" title="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5829707/" target="_blank"http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5... 

According to a recent Zogby International poll of 2,586 people in five Islamic countries and survey data from noted Middle East scholar Shibley Telhami:

* Almost 100 percent of Egyptians have an unfavorable view of the United States compared with 76 percent in 2002.

* In Morocco, the number viewing the United States unfavorably has jumped from 61 percent in 2002 to 88 percent.

* In Saudi Arabia, the number rose from 87 percent in 2002 to 94 percent.

But perhaps most telling was the No. 4 name on the list of most admired world leaders in Telhami's survey: Osama bin Laden.

I heard about this new relegion from a friend.  The Jedi Knights relegion is official only in England.  Although the Jedi Knights are also found in Australia.

Jedi Knights achieve official recognition as a religion.

Updated Jedi Knights have gained official recognition as a religion in the UK Census 2001.

Coming very near the bottom of an official list of religions put out by the Statistics Office, Jedi Knight is known by the code 896. Heathen comes in at 897. Followed by Atheist at 898 and lastly None with 899. It's not exactly a ringing endorsement though since the 800s come after every other religion, no matter how obscure, and 700 is used for all "other religions". http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/10/09/jedi_knight s_achieve_official_recogn ition/" title="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/10/09/jedi_knight s_achieve_official_recogn ition/" target="_blank"http://www.theregister.co.uk/...

Guide to Living - Religion (How to be a Jedi Knight) http://balsallbadboys.com/guidetoliving/guideto living_jedi.htm" title="http://balsallbadboys.com/guidetoliving/guideto living_jedi.htm" target="_blank"http://balsallbadboys.com/gui...

"Many working families depend on overtime to pay bills—especially during the current economic recession that has resulted in stagnant and declining wages coupled with increasing costs of health care, prescription drugs, child care and other essentials. The Bush overtime pay take-away would cut into many of these families’ paychecks." http://www.saveovertimepay.org/bushproposal.htm" title="http://www.saveovertimepay.org/bushproposal.htm" target="_blank"http://www.saveovertimepay.or...

Job that are affected are found at this link http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_viewpoint s_final_overtime_regulati ons" title="http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_viewpoint s_final_overtime_regulati ons" target="_blank"http://www.epinet.org/content...House Republicans Refuse to Allow Debate or Vote on Overtime Pay Rules

Some republican policies that have hurt America. 

"The American people need to know we're facing a different enemy than we've ever faced. This enemy hides in shadows and has no regard for human life. This is an enemy who preys on innocent and unsuspecting people, then runs for cover. But it won't be able to run to for cover forever"  Bush speech on terror.  But look at the polices set forth by the republicans. http://www.cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view .cgi?/news/2001/09/12/bush 010912" title="http://www.cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view .cgi?/news/2001/09/12/bush 010912" target="_blank"http://www.cbc.ca/cgi-bin/tem...

VETERANS PROGRAMS SLASHED BY HOUSE REPUBLICANS  

Budget Committee Blueprint Cuts Veterans Health Care and Other Benefits
by Nearly $25 Billion http://veterans.house.gov/democratic/press/108t h/3-13-03budget.htm" title="http://veterans.house.gov/democratic/press/108t h/3-13-03budget.htm" target="_blank"http://veterans.house.gov/dem...

Republican Budget Puts Health Care Programs
on the Chopping Block

GOP Proposal Sends Message to Seniors, Veterans, and Children
that Their Health Care Needs are not a Priority

Justice Department officials recently announced that they were awarding $47 million to scores of local law enforcement agencies for the hiring of police officers. Mr. Bush had just proposed cutting the budget for the program, known as Community Oriented Policing Services, by 87 percent, to $97 million next year, from $756 million.  http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0519-13.htm" title="http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0519-13.htm" target="_blank"http://www.commondreams.org/h...

May 22, 2001
Bush Administration suspends arsenic-in-drinking-water protections http://www.keithboykin.com/arch/000846.html" title="http://www.keithboykin.com/arch/000846.html" target="_blank"http://www.keithboykin.com/ar...

Who is the real enemy of the American people?

I just heard about this today. "Iran threatens a first strike policy against the US and Israel. Some new faces have been added to the PMO" http://maisonneuve.org/blog/index.php?itemid=402" title="http://maisonneuve.org/blog/index.php?itemid=402" target="_blank"http://maisonneuve.org/blog/i...  But why would Iran feel threatened by America?  Could it be becuase of the State of the Union address.

Let us summarize the accusations or allegations against Iran, factors that were supposedly instrumental in President Bush labeling Iran as a member of the ‘Axis of Evil’ troika in his State of the Union address in January, 2002:

1. Iran is the number-one state supporter of international terrorism.
   
   
2. Iran has an unacceptable record of human-rights violations.
   
   
3. Iran is a destabilizing force and a source of agitation in the Middle East.
   
   
4. Iran is opposed to any peaceful resolution of Israeli-Palestinian issues.
   
   
5. Iran is amassing weapons of mass destruction and is on the way to acquiring nuclear weapons.
   
   
6. If left unchecked, Iran will provide these weapons to terrorist networks around the world.
   
   
7. The theocracy in Iran is not open to any dialogue with the civilized world.

http://www.payvand.com/news/04/aug/1012.html" title="http://www.payvand.com/news/04/aug/1012.html" target="_blank"http://www.payvand.com/news/0...

"We will not sit [with arms folded] to wait for what others will do to us," Iran's defence minister, Rear-Admiral Ali Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera TV yesterday when asked if Iran would respond to a US attack on its nuclear facilities"

"Some military commanders in Iran are convinced that preventive operations which the Americans talk about are not their monopoly,

"America is not the only one present in the region. We are also present, from Khost to Kandahar in Afghanistan; we are present in the Gulf and we can be present in Iraq," said Shamkhani" http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=3131" title="http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=3131" target="_blank"http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-...

Will America's pre-emptive strike policy be used againist America itself.

The Iraqi soccer team appear to be some what mad at Bush.  The soccer team is mad becuase Bush used the soccer team in political ads without asking the iraqi soccer team if they wanted to be in a politiccal ad.

“Iraq as a team does not want Mr. Bush to use us for the presidential campaign,” said midfielder Salih Sadir. “He can find another way to advertise himself"

Sadir was angered at Mr. Bush’s adverts, which show pictures of the Afghan and Iraqi flags with the words: “At this Olympics there will be two more free nations – and two fewer terrorist regimes.”

“We don’t wish for the presence of Americans in our country. We want them to go away,” said Sadir, aged 21, whose home town of Najaf has been demolished by the war.

Another star player, Ahmed Manajid, aged 22, said of Mr. Bush: “How will he meet his god having slaughtered so many men and women? He has committed so many crimes.”

In an interview with the U.S. magazine Sports Illustrated, the team coach Adnan Hamad spoke of the ongoing violence in his homeland.

“My problems are not with the American people. They are with what America has done in Iraq: destroy everything.

“The American army has killed so many people in Iraq. What is freedom when I go to the stadium and there are shootings on the road?”  http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=3148" title="http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=3148" target="_blank"http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-...

Once again the president of the United States does what ever he wants as long as it benifits him and his supporters.  This time it is not american citzens who are mad at his deceptive tactics, its the iraqi soccer team who is outraged.

I just heard about this today. "Iran threatens a first strike policy against the US and Israel. Some new faces have been added to the PMO" http://maisonneuve.org/blog/index.php?itemid=402" title="http://maisonneuve.org/blog/index.php?itemid=402" target="_blank"http://maisonneuve.org/blog/i...  But why would Iran feel threatened by America?  Could it be becuase of the State of the Union address.  

Let us summarize the accusations or allegations against Iran, factors that were supposedly instrumental in President Bush labeling Iran as a member of the ‘Axis of Evil’ troika in his State of the Union address in January, 2002:

1. Iran is the number-one state supporter of international terrorism.
   
2. Iran has an unacceptable record of human-rights violations.
   
3. Iran is a destabilizing force and a source of agitation in the Middle East.
   
4. Iran is opposed to any peaceful resolution of Israeli-Palestinian issues.
   
5. Iran is amassing weapons of mass destruction and is on the way to acquiring nuclear weapons.
   
6. If left unchecked, Iran will provide these weapons to terrorist networks around the world.
   
7. The theocracy in Iran is not open to any dialogue with the civilized world

 http://www.payvand.com/news/04/aug/1012.html" title="http://www.payvand.com/news/04/aug/1012.html" target="_blank"http://www.payvand.com/news/0...

"We will not sit [with arms folded] to wait for what others will do to us," Iran's defence minister, Rear-Admiral Ali Shamkhani told Al-Jazeera TV yesterday when asked if Iran would respond to a US attack on its nuclear facilities"

"Some military commanders in Iran are convinced that preventive operations which the Americans talk about are not their monopoly,

"America is not the only one present in the region. We are also present, from Khost to Kandahar in Afghanistan; we are present in the Gulf and we can be present in Iraq," said Shamkhani" http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=3131" title="http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/news_service/ middle_east_full_story.asp?service_id=3131" target="_blank"http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-...

Will America's pre-emptive strike policy be used againist America itself.

American Crusades

short and brief, not going post often. When I have time, I'll post some short posts here and there? I need to start training again in my martial art discpline, before I start to get lazy and not decide to train again. 

I am looking for people who play private game's? Passwords and name of sever would help?  I am getting tired of public severs? To many cheaters.

"It was 1959 when Dick Cheney, then a student at Yale University, turned 18 and became eligible for the draft.

Eventually, like 16 million other young men of that era, Mr. Cheney sought deferments. By the time he turned 26 in January 1967 and was no longer eligible for the draft, he had asked for and received five deferments, four because he was a student and one for being a new father." http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/4983.html" title="http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/4983.html" target="_blank"http://hnn.us/blogs/entries/4... 

 On Oct. 6, 1965, the Selective Service lifted its ban against drafting married men who had no children. Nine months and two days later, Mr. Cheney's first daughter, Elizabeth, was born."

In February 1962, when Mr. Cheney was classified as 1-A available for service he was doing poorly at Yale. But the military was taking only older men at that point, and like others who were in college at the time, Mr. Cheney seemed to have little concern about being drafted.

In June, he left Yale. After returning home to Casper, a small city in east-central Wyoming, he worked as a lineman for a power company.

What ever happened to the no-child left behind act?  Bush has done this for education in America.

 Freezes maximum Pell Grant. Despite rising college costs, President Bush freezes the maximum Pell Grant at $4,050. This is a third year in a row that the President has frozen or cut the maximum Pell Grant. While campaigning in 2000, President Bush pledged to make college more affordable and accessible by increasing the maximum Pell Grant for freshmen to $5,100, but he has yet to make good on his promise.

Freezes or cuts college loans and work-study. The Bush budget cuts funding for Perkins Loans by $100 million. It also freezes or eliminates funding for campus-based student aid programs, resulting in the loss of grants, work-study, and loans to about 78,000 students. This year, tuition at state universities increased nationwide by as much as 40 percent in some states.

Cuts $316 million from vocational education and community colleges. The Bush budget cuts $316 million – a 25 percent reduction – from vocational education and community colleges. This new round of cuts is in addition to more than $1.5 billion in proposed cuts to job training and vocational education programs since he took office.

Makes college loans more expensive. The Bush budget requires student loan guaranty agencies to collect a one-percent insurance premium from students beginning this year, costing students $4.0 billion over 10 years.

Eliminates state college scholarships program, and risks $1 billion in non-federal Student Aid. The Bush budget eliminates the $66 million Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnerships (LEAP) initiative, which encourages states to establish college scholarships for college students. In 2001-2002, the federal investment in LEAP leveraged more than $1 billion in matching state spending.

Cuts programs that boost college opportunities for students and veterans. The Bush budget freezes GEAR UP and TRIO funding – programs that boost opportunities for veterans, the disadvantaged, and first generation college students to earn a college degree. The President's freeze severely handicaps TRIO – which currently serves only 7 percent of all eligible students and veterans due to inadequate funding.

Places student aid program operations at risk. The Bush budget puts stable student aid administrative funds at risk by subjecting them to an annual appropriation. This proposed change would force administrative funding to compete against Pell grants and other higher education priorities for resources, and would jeopardize the ability of the Education Department to administer the student aid programs safely and soundly.

Freezes youth job training programs. Despite the weak job market and the enormous need for job training programs, the Bush budget freezes funding for youth job training programs. The budget provides $2.6 billion for youth job training, a $26 million (1.0 percent) increase over the FY 2004 enacted level. http://www.housedemocrats.gov/news/librarydetail.cfm?library_content_id=15 7" title="http://www.housedemocrats.gov/news/librarydetail.cfm?library_content_id=15 7" target="_blank"http://www.housedemocrats.gov...

These polices, I veiw as oppresive.  The wealthly make it alot harder someone to get a college education.  While the children of wealthy don' t have to worry about paying the college tuition.  The children of wealthly will get there college education.  This is required becuase they are destined to replace their parents postion in the social order or what the conservatives say ( The New World Order ).  While the poor working American child struggles to obtain a college education.  To better themselves with a college degree.  If wealthly make things hard for you are more likely to surcome to the idea of that your place in the New World Order is not to get a college education, you are peon in a big pond.  Your job is to follow the orders of the policy makers.      & nbsp; 

Shaking Hands: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein greets Donald Rumsfeld, then special envoy of President Ronald Reagan, in Baghdad on December 20, 1983

http://www.gwu.edu/" title="http://www.gwu.edu/" target="_blank"http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82 /

=http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/i...

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld talks to 60 Minutes in his first interview since Saddam's capture.  (Photo: CBS)

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/14/60 minutes/main588518.shtml" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/14/60 minutes/main588518.shtml" target="_blank"http://www.cbsnews.com/storie...

Bush jr has signed by executive order 13233, overriding the 1978 Presidential Records Act.  Why jr want to do this? The presidential records act.  The Act provided that a president's papers will be made available to the public 12 years after he leaves office. The new executive order adds a wrinkle to the old rule by current and former presidents the right to delay publication of their papers beyond the 12-year limit.

Make no mistake about it. Junior is doing this to look out for Daddy, who has a few skeletons in his closet, most notably his famous ''out of the loop'' assertion that was challenged by Special Prosecutor Lawrence Walsh in the late days of a hotly contested campaign that was ultimately won by Bill Clinton. Clearly there is a feeling that the Reagan presidential papers are best left buried deep, at least for a little while longer, and with the new Executive Order Bush junior has provided the shovel to do the job.  http://www.singmind.com/singleminded/200201/s ecrets.htm" title="http://www.singmind.com/singleminded/200201/s ecrets.htm" target="_blank"http://www.singmind.com/singl...

I wondering what kind of decisions Bush Sr did while the president of U.S. in the early 1990's.  The son has used executive order to prevent Sr president's paper's from being release?  12 years have already past, should,nt the people be infrom on what type of non publicizes decisions their president made 12 years ago.

This is a crazy Exectutive order.  If algebra is outlawed how does the bush pollesters do polls?  I think you need more than just basic math such as adding and subtracting to get the results of a poll. 

WASHINGTON, DC--Saying it encourages the kind of spurious logic that allows people to believe that if your against war you're not necessarily for the terrorists (or that you're not necessarily with or against America), President George W. Bush today signed an executive order which subjects algebra users not only to arrest and prosecution, but possible revocation of citizenship and deportation or indefinite imprisonment with no rights to due process.

The signing of the Executive Order was widely hailed as a victory by males aged 12 to 22. Women in the same age group were divided on the issue.

"xz = xy(-z)? What does that mean? " Bush told the Washington Press corps. Using algebra shall henceforth be considered supporting terrorism, Bush said. "Math which simply uses numbers to support moral relativism is junk math. It belongs in the dust bin of history, along with the theory of evolution and global warming."

When one reporter asked how weapons could be engineered without algebra, the president, after carefully considering the question said, "Look, Jesus didn't need algebra and neither do I. And the American people, too."

After the press conference the reporter was heard to remark, "Jesus didn't need F-18's and thermonuclear warheads either. I can't help wondering if this is somehow personal for him. Yeah, well anyway, good luck landing Air Force One."

Indeed, speculation was rampant on Capital Hill that there may have been some personal motivation to issue the order. Reportedly math and math related subjects were among the president's poorest in high school and college. "It's hard to believe math could have been that much trouble for him," said one source, on condition of anonymity, "when you consider his flair for the English language." http://www.brokennewz.com/weekend/bushalgebra.asp" title="http://www.brokennewz.com/weekend/bushalgebra.asp" target="_blank"http://www.brokennewz.com/wee...

CINCINNATI, Ohio (CNN) -- Promising "a more agile and more flexible force," President Bush announced on Monday a major realignment of U.S. forces around the world.

Bush said about 60,000 to 70,000 uniformed personnel would move from overseas to posts in the United States over the next decade. The move would also involve about 100,000 family members and civilian employees, Bush said.

"The new plan will help us fight and win these wars of the 21st century," Bush said in a speech before a convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars

In Germany, the two divisions that will return are the Army's 1st Armored Division and 1st Infantry Division. That shift is not expected to take place before 2006.

The "heavy" divisions, each with 10,000 to 15,000 soldiers, will be replaced by a smaller, lighter and more mobile brigade equipped with the Army's new Stryker armored vehicles. A brigade has 3,000 to 5,000 troops

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/1 6/bush.troops.home/index.html" title="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/1 6/bush.troops.home/index.html" target="_blank"http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPO...

This plan will help us fight and win these wars of the 21st century.  What kind of wars does Bush mean?  The war on terror.  When Bush says, "these wars of the 21st centruy" how many wars does bush mean?  Why would heavy divison be brought back to America and be replaced with smaller divisions?  Bus h is planning something.  Heavy divisons are the backbone of any invasion force.  What country does bush plan to invade near america.  Canada, Mexico, or amer ica itself.  So within America there will be the following forces minus 160,000 troops station in Iraq and Afghan theaters.

Sixteen of the U.S. Army's 33 active-duty combat brigades are in Iraq; another two are in Afghanistan; two more are in Korea; one more is in the Balkans http://www.brookings.edu/views/op-ed/ohanlon/2 0030804.htm" title="http://www.brookings.edu/views/op-ed/ohanlon/2 0030804.htm" target="_blank"http://www.brookings.edu/view...

Current Force Structure and Assumptions About Employing Forces
The active component of the Army contains about 300,000 military personnel in deployable units, about half of whom are organized into maneuver units (10 divi-sions, with 33 brigade combat teams). The other half are assigned to various corps- and theater-level support units (see Table 4).7 The Army’s reserve component has about 470,000 military personnel in deployable units. Of those, about one-third are organized into maneuver units (8 divisions, with about 36 brigade combat teams), and the other two-thirds serve in corps- and theater-level support units.

The Marine Corps’s active component contains about 170,000 military personnel in deployable units, who are organized into three divisions (with eight infantry regiments, the equivalent of Army brigades), three air wings, and three support groups.8 The reserve component of the Marine Corps has about 35,000 military personnel, organized into a division (with three infantry regiments), an air wing, and a support group. In examining the occupation of Iraq, CBO used brigade-sized maneuver units—brigade combat teams (BCTs) for the Army and Marine expeditionary brigades (MEBs) for the Marine Corps—as the primary unit of analysis.9 The Army has employed brigade-sized forces in peacekeeping operations over the past decade, and most Army and Marine Corps commitments can be measured by the number of brigades employed.   http://www.therant.info/archive/001665.html" title="http://www.therant.info/archive/001665.html" target="_blank"http://www.therant.info/archi... Total National Guard troop strength is about 460,000. Although each state's Guard reports to the governor, http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/wndarchive/26591.html" title="http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/wndarchive/26591.html" target="_blank"http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/w...

Who does Bush plan to make war, near America or with in America?  This is alot of military firepower concentreted within America.  

The war president with his war rhetoric.  President Bush on Friday marked the anniversary of the start of the war on Iraq with a White House speech calling for U.S. allies to keep up the fight there and the wider battle against terrorism.

"Each of us has pledged before the world: We will never bow to the violence of a few," the president said to an audience of ambassadors. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/18/ir aq/main607160.shtml" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/18/ir aq/main607160.shtml" target="_blank"http://www.cbsnews.com/storie...

This speech was given by Bush on March 19, 2004.

But what happened to American policy in Fallujuh.  The enemy was fighting back, ( as if they had nothing to lose and everything to gain)  American deaths numbered over 100 in that month alone.  "The American deaths raise to 126 the number of U.S. troops killed in combat in April, the bloodiest month for U.S. forces in Iraq"  http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20040429 /FP_001.htm" title="http://www.eagletribune.com/news/stories/20040429 /FP_001.htm" target="_blank"http://www.eagletribune.com/n...

The decision by the Bush administration and the Pentagon to pull back the Marines besieging the city of Fallujah is a devastating setback for the US occupation regime in Iraq. Faced with the prospect of house-to-house combat against an insurgency rooted in the city, the US government apparently decided that the cost of retaking the city, both militarily and politically, was too great. April 29,2004.  http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/may2004 /fall-m04.shtml" title="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/may2004 /fall-m04.shtml" target="_blank"http://www.wsws.org/articles/...

What ever happen to the speech "We will never bow to the violence of the few." ( Bush 3/19/2004 )  This is a flip flop.  To tell the world that America will not bow to the violence of the few on March 19, 2004.  Then 31 days later tell the world America will stop its offensive in Fallujuh.  Becuase the cost militarily and politically was too great. Bush told the world we must not give in to the demands of terrorrist.  President Bush told the White House audience, 'There is no neutral ground in the fight between civilization and terror.

April 28 saw the last 260 of Spain’s 1,300 combat soldiers finally leave Iraq nearly two weeks ahead of schedule. Prime Minister Jose Zapatero announced the pull-out on April 18.  http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/may2004 /spai-m08.shtml" title="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/may2004 /spai-m08.shtml" target="_blank"http://www.wsws.org/articles/...

The war president was going to cut combat pay for U.S. soliders in Iraq.

The White House quickly backpedaled Thursday on Pentagon plans to cut the combat pay of the 157,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan after disclosure of the idea quickly became a political embarrassment.

The Pentagon's support for the idea of rolling back "imminent danger pay" by $75 a month and "family separation allowances" for the American forces by $150 a month collapsed after a story in The Chronicle Thursday generated intense criticism from military families, veterans groups and Democratic candidates seeking to unseat President Bush in 2004. http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0815-09.htm" title="http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0815-09.htm" target="_blank"http://www.commondreams.org/h... 

Why would the president cut combat pay for the soliders in Iraq?  There is not enough federal funds, because of the bush tax cuts for the rich.    

This is the president, who tells the public to support the troops in Iraq.   Then through backdoor manipulatio n.  The president wants to cut combat pay for soliders.  This is a president of hypocrisy.  George W Bush = The Great Deciver.

THINGS YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE TO BE A REPUBLICAN TODAY:

Saddam was a good guy when Reagan armed him, a bad guy when Bush's daddy made war on him, a good guy when Cheney did business with him and a bad guy when Bush needed a "we can't find Bin Laden" diversion.

Trade with Cuba is wrong because the country is communist, but trade with China and Vietnam is vital to a spirit of international harmony.

A woman can't be trusted with decisions about her own body, but
multi-national corporations can make decisions affecting all mankind without regulation.

Jesus loves you, and shares your hatred of homosexuals and Hillary Clinton.

The best way to improve military morale is to praise the troops in speeches while slashing veterans' benefits and combat pay.

If condoms are kept out of schools, adolescents won't have sex.

Providing health care to all Iraqis is sound policy. Providing health care to all Americans is socialism.

HMOs and insurance companies have the best interests of the public at heart.

Global warming and tobacco's link to cancer are junk science, but
creationism should be taught in schools.

A president lying about an extramarital affair is an impeachable offense. A president lying to enlist support for a war in which thousands die is solid defense policy.

Government should limit itself to the powers named in the Constitution, which include banning gay marriages and censoring the Internet.

The public has a right to know about Hillary's cattle trades, but George Bush's cocaine conviction is none of our business.

Being a drug addict is a moral failing and a crime, unless you're a
conservative radio host. Then it's an illness, and you need our prayers for your recovery.

You support states' rights, which means Attorney General John Ashcroft can tell states what local voter initiatives they have the right to adopt.

What Bill Clinton did in the 1960s is of vital national interest, but what Bush did in the '80s is irrelevant.
http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=155323" title="http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs/topic.php?id=155323" target="_blank"http://www.newgrounds.com/bbs...

Characteristics of Scary White Guys (SWGs)

What are the characteristics of this rare breed, the scary white guy? At a minimum, the SWG has some or all of these characteristics:

He is a bully who uses intimidation as a regular tactic.
He is destructive, in that he kills possibilities and destroys human aspirations.
He is self-centered, egocentric and selfish.
He is an exploiter, employing his power to the greatest possible advantage.
He is greedy in that he seeks more than he could possibly need.
He is a denier who refuses to acknowledge disagreeable realities.
He is corrupt, dishonest, bending the rules for personal or political gain.
He is a scapegoater, adept at pitting people against each other and blaming victims for their suffering.

Ultimately, Scary Power is the ability to control the public narrative to frame messages: globalization benefits all; environmentalists created the energy shortage; fair trade is a wishful dream. The scary guys' control of the narrative also discourages action, isolates people from one another and turns them off to engagement in public life. It breeds cynicism, hopelessness and apathy.

The characteristics above blend into various roles as SWGs form teams and alliances. Guys like Ronald Reagan carry the water for SWGs operating behind the scenes. George W. Bush, with his ah-shucks style, plays the enabler for friends like Kenneth Lay, chairman of the Houston-based Enron Corporation, as they make their financial killings. Some are the hit men, a role that Vice President Cheney plays to take the heat off of his partner. Others, like New Jersey Senator Robert Torricelli, are just smart, aggressive bullies who steamroll the opposition through sheer ambition.

Bush-Cheney, Co-Presidents of the U.S.

It's impossible to separate these two SWGs. As the new joke goes, "Have you heard the one about the need to protect Bush? He's just a heartbeat away from the Presidency."

On the campaign trail a year ago, George W. Bush said, "As we use nature's gifts, we must do so wisely. Prosperity will mean little if we leave future generations a world of polluted air, toxic lakes and rivers, and vanished forests." Texas, meanwhile, had the most toxic air emissions and cancer-causing pollution in the country. Can anyone say doubletalk?

Bush's environmental pledges exemplify a tool used very often by SWGs, the Big Lie. A clever rhetorical device, the Big Lie operates on the principle that if you make knowingly false assertions with enough conviction, and repeated them constantly, those with their hands on the truth are put on the defensive. Regulations about carbon dioxide emissions, worker's protection laws, drilling for oil in Alaska, building roads in the national forest -- these attacks on health and the environment all depend on Big Lies.

As Bush spouts doubletalk to the hoodwinked press, Cheney pulls the strings behind the scene. Cheney, who was paid $36 million by Halliburton oil company the last year he worked there, recently advocated for building a new power plant every week for 20 years in order to meet our energy needs. "Conservation may be a sign of personal virtue," he said, "but not a sufficient basis for sound comprehensive energy policy." Yeah, tell that to the scientists from five national science labs whose three-year study concluded that a "government-led conservation program could cut growth in energy consumption in half, using proven technology already in place."

As columnist Robert Scheer writes, "Why beat around the Bush? Surrogate president Dick Cheney is behaving like an oil-guzzling, intellectually irresponsible, anti-environmental oaf. To ignore scientific achievement on energy conservation is to lie to the American people about the dimensions of the problem. This is not leadership, it is fear-mongering that withholds ... sound scientific information in order to justify eviscerating conservation policy."

As for Dubya, well, we underestimate him as a moron at our peril. As Mark Crispin Miller writes in his new book "The Bush Dyslexicon," (W.W. Norton 2001) "our president is not an imbecile, but an operator just as canny as he is hard-hearted. At the nasty kind of politics, he is extraordinarily shrewd."

Rupert Murdoch, Media Mogul

Choosing the scariest media mogul was not easy. But transplanted Aussie Rupert Murdoch, head of the global News Corporation, gets the nod. Murdoch's voracious empire-building, his right-wing agenda, and his use of his media properties to achieve political gain set him apart. His tabloids in London, New York and Australia have repeatedly supported or undermined candidates, and his conservative Fox News channel helped get Bush declared the winner on election night. Last year, News Corp. gave $800,000 to U.S. candidates, with 70 percent going to Republicans.

Already owner of the Fox Network, Murdoch now intends to gain control of U.S. satellite TV to implement his vision of interactive television as the ultimate buying environment. The goal: to replace the Internet with high-speed satellite access to Murdoch's "walled garden," where subscribers would be limited to what his content machine has to offer.

Kenneth Lay, CEO of Enron

As head honcho of a leading Texas energy company, Kenneth Lay has aggressively championed the types of energy policies that have burdened California with rolling electrical blackouts. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Lay created a new kind of company as a result of deregulation victories, one that "essentially produces nothing, but makes money as a middle-man buying electricity from generators and selling it to consumers. During the first quarter of this year Enron revenues increased 281 percent to $50.1 billion."

Lay also represents the most extreme form of the pay-to-play corruption that dominates American politics. The largest of Bush's campaign contributors, his influence has reached unprecedented heights. According to The New York Times, he has even supplied Bush with candidates to regulate the power industry, and has threatened to have the head of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission removed if he opposes deregulation.

Tom Delay, House Majority Whip

Tom DeLay approaches regulations like the cockroaches he faced as an exterminator (his former career). It took Congress ten years to pass legislation protecting the 600,000 workers who develop repetitive stress injuries each year. It took Delay three months, and millions of big business dollars, to repeal it.

DeLay has worked tirelessly to gut the Clean Air Act. He's called the EPA "the Gestapo of government," and he thinks volcanoes cause global warming. Described in Rolling Stone as Bush's legislative muscleman, DeLay leads by "killing or neutering anything that deviates from right wing orthodoxy. DeLay's vision of America looks like Houston on a bad day: ruled by corporate fat cats, polluted, gridlocked, a place where progress is measured by the size of your SUV and freedom is defined by a choice of tee-off times."

Sandy Weill, Chairman of Citigroup

Greed is maybe more understandable in the world of finance. But when legendary dealmaker Sanford I. Weill, Chairman of Citigroup, bought Associates First Capital for 31 billion, he was basically saying there is no money too dirty for him. Associate First Capital is notorious in the field of predatory lending, which takes advantage of unsophisticated homeowners. It has been named in at least 700 lawsuits. As Martin Eakes, founder of Self-Help Credit Union, says, "It's simply unacceptable to have the largest bank in America take over the icon of predatory lending."

Citgroup engages in high-interest lending in low-income communities across the U.S., and has long been a target of protest because of its redlining practices. Citigroup is also financing some of today's greatest environmental horrors, like the destruction of Indonesian rain forests, the Chad-Cameroon oil pipeline and China's Three Gorges dam, which will displace two million people. "Sandy Weill is responsible for immense ecological and human disasters because Citigroup, as a huge global lender, finances so much destruction," says Shannon Wright, Communications Director at the Rain Forest Action Network.

Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense

As the bellicose head of the Defense Department, Donald Rumsfeld is in the position to do massive harm, as he aggressively pushes for a National Missile Defense (NMD) system -- a redux of the Star Wars boondoggle discredited way back in the Reagan days.

Let's be clear here -- such a missile defense system won't work, isn't needed and is hugely expensive. However, Rumsfeld needs to push it because it makes his friends and funders at Boeing, Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon, TRW and the other defense companies very happy. (Those four have contributed $7 million to both political parties, spent $32.3 million lobbying, and -- surprise! -- have received NMD contracts to the tune of $2 billion per year. Nice return on the dollar.)

But Bush and Co. want a huge new system, which would include a space-based, laser-firing satellite system. The cost: $240 billion. That's pretty expensive for something that won't make us safer but will make defense contractors rich, at the expense of seniors, education, health care, the whole nine yards.

Lee R. Raymond, CEO of ExxonMobil

Raymond heads the world's third-largest corporation, which earned more than $17 billion in profits in 2000, exceeding many nations' revenues. So when Raymond questions whether global warming exists or if fossil fuels play any role in it, people shudder. Because ExxonMobil's attitudes and policies impact virtually everyone.

ExxonMobil carries the big club for the Neanderthal wing of the fossil fuel lobby. According to author Ross Gelspan, it is the only major oil company to deny climate change, using outdated, manipulated and unqualified information. British Petroleum, by contrast, has become the largest producer of solar energy systems in the world. Even Shell and Texaco have also made progress. ExxonMobil hasn't.

John Walters, Drug Czar

With John Walters as our new Drug Czar (backed by arch-conservative John Ashcroft as Attorney General), expect a marked escalation of the hugely unpopular drug war. While Canada is moving towards legalizing marijuana and six states have passed medical marijuana bills, Walters will likely head federal drug policy back into the stone age.

Walters thinks the racism of sentencing discrepency is an urban myth; is against drug treatment; advocates stiffer penalties against drug users; and despite untold billions of dollars spent achieving nothing, wholeheartedly supports the military wing of the drug war.

Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Phoenix's Maricopa County Jail

Arpaio runs a jail for petty criminals with sentences of less than a year, many of whom have not yet gone to trial. Nevertheless, he boasts about heading one of most severe penal institutions in the U.S. He started the country's first female chain gang, giving women the choice of burying bodies in Phoenix's pauper cemetery or having 23 hours of lockdown.

The Feds sued Arpaio for using excessive force in 1997. In 1998, a U.S. Department of Justice consultant condemned the use of restraint chairs, pepper spray, alleged hog-tying and the use of "unprovoked" and "unjustified" force. But Sheriff Joe keeps on escalating. Last June, the Arizona Republic reported that he was putting dogs in the jail's few air-conditioned cells. As he told the paper, "It's too hot for the dogs over in the tents with the inmates." Arpaio spends 66 cents a day on food for each inmate, twice that for a dog. He is a constant propagandist, averaging a speech a day, and many consider him the most popular person in Arizona.

Robert Torricelli, New Jersey Senator

Democratic Senator Robert Torricelli demonstrates that moral bankruptcy and political corruption ignore party lines. Dubbed "The Torch" by his Washington colleagues, Torricelli has a reputation as a political hustler. He raised a record $103.5 million as head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. His bully rep among his colleagues was underscored when, in 1999, he exploded at his New Jersey Senate colleague Frank Lautenberg, "You're a fucking piece of shit. And I'm going to cut your balls off."

Hammered by a series of New York Times stories, and with Justice Department investigators breathing down his neck, the pugnacious Senator maintains his innocence against mounting corruption charges. He allegedly received ten custom-made Italian suits and an $8,100 Rolex watch, among other items, from a Chinese businessman who pled guilty to giving him $53,700 in illegal campaign contributions.

Rudy Giuliani, New York Mayor

Rudy Giuliani is the master scapegoater. His list of targets includes homeless people, graffiti artists, panhandlers and even guys who wash your windows at stoplights. But when Giuliani caught a whiff of pot after a political event, his wrath went into overdrive. "Bust those pot smokers!" he screamed, and arrests in New York went through the roof. By the end of 2000, 59,945 people had been arrested for pot, up 39 percent from 1999. In 1992, as DRCNet.org has reported, only 720 pot smokers were arrested in New York City. New York State decriminalized pot in the mid-1970s, a fact that Giuliani has ignored.

Giuliani's stop-and-frisk racial profiling approach has stirred up heat, with the Justice Department and the State Attorney General documenting abuse. His Operation Condor, which swept through neighborhoods and locked up thousands of people, mostly of color, deepened the wedge between citizens and the police.

Giuliani's attacks on arts institutions for exhibits he finds offensive are infamous, including his attempts to deny museums government funds. Though the courts threw out these efforts, he recently formed an advisory committee to develop decency standards -- a move that talk show host Jay Leno immediately labeled as fascist.

http://www.alternet.org/story/10949" title="http://www.alternet.org/story/10949" target="_blank"http://www.alternet.org/story... 

Another Bush Flip flip

Bush: Al Qaeda and Saddam same. "You can't distinguish between Al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror." (Sept. 25, 2002.)

Bush: Saddam had no role in 9/11. "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in Sept. 11." (Sept. 17, 2003.) http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_ opinion/oped/articles/200 4/06/05/steadfast_bushs_a mazing_flip_flops/" title="http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_ opinion/oped/articles/200 4/06/05/steadfast_bushs_a mazing_flip_flops/" target="_blank"http://www.boston.com/news/gl...

The title is self explanatory.  You can read the read the link. http://emperor.vwh.net/articles/randy/swas5a .htm" title="http://emperor.vwh.net/articles/randy/swas5a .htm" target="_blank"http://emperor.vwh.net/articl...  Summary of what the article says is.  Gerorge Bush sr father was a nazi financier in the United states at the time of world war two.  "In 1926 Bert Walker did a favor for his new son-in-law, Prescott Bush. It was the sort of favor families do to help their children make a start in life, but Prescott came to regret it bitterly. Walker made Prescott vice president of W. A. Harriman. The problem was that Walker's specialty was companies that traded with Germany. As Thyssen and the other German industrialists consolidated Hitler's political power in the 1930s, an American financial connection was needed. According to our sources, Union Banking became an out-and-out Nazi money-laundering machine. . . ." link to bush family tree http://www.ancestry.com/landing/famoustrees/g wbush/bush_tree.htm" title="http://www.ancestry.com/landing/famoustrees/g wbush/bush_tree.htm" target="_blank"http://www.ancestry.com/landi...

This post is a counter to deshanews unbelievalbe poll showing Bush winning close to the enitre country.

Deshanews poll, just the title Aol poll: Bush
wins in landslide Unscientific survey indicates president collecting 48 states http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39932" title="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39932" target="_blank"http://www.worldnetdaily.com/...
Readers take note on the bold font. 

Unscientific pseudo-polls are widespread and sometimes entertaining, if always quite meaningless. Examples include 900-number call-in polls, man-on-the-street surveys, most Internet polls, shopping mall polls,http://www.ncpp.org/qajsa.htm...;         & nbsp;   &n bsp;   &nb sp;  

The results below have been obtained by useing scientific methods of survey.  Unlike deshanews unscientific aol poll results. 

Wednesday August 11, 2004--For the second straight day, the Rasmussen Reports Presidential Tracking Poll shows Senator John Kerry with 49% of the vote and President George W. Bush with 46%. The Tracking Poll is updated daily by noon Eastern.

Today is the first time in more than six months of daily polling that either candidate has reached the 49% mark on consecutive days. Since Senator Kerry wrapped up the Democratic nomination on Super Tuesday, he has now reached the 49% mark on four occasions. During that same time frame, President Bush has never exceeded 48% in our Tracking Poll. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Presidential_Tracking _Poll.htm" title="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Presidential_Tracking _Poll.htm" target="_blank"http://www.rasmussenreports.c...

Now if you were to compare this poll with deshanews poll. Deshanews results were posted on August 12,2004. On day after the scientific poll results were released. August 11,2004.

This is what I want to compare. This is deshanews poll results "That's a total of just 13 electoral votes for Kerry, compared to 525 for Bush. The magic number of electoral votes to win the White House is 270 . " Now these are the results from sceintific poll 

Date

Bush

Kerry

Now I don't know how within the peroid of 72 hours Bush gained 525 electoral votes.  What happened to all those kerry supporters with a peroid of 72 hours?  Did rapture occur and god took them to be with him?   May be its just the difference between a scientific poll results and unscientific poll results?

This is my response to deshanews accusations.  These responses are jesusisangry responses only. No ones else deshanews.  So don't take my responses out of context and say its the resonses by the liberals. 

You are the ones who would have been against going after Hitler in WW2.  You would have said he wasn't directly affecting us, so who cares.  You know this is the truth.

American was'nt ready for world two.  America had to build it's military before it was ready to go to war.

04/11/1939

Although President Roosevelt has declared American neutrality in the war in Europe, a Neutrality Act is signed that allows the US to send arms and other aid to Britain and France

30/05/1940

Roosevelt asks Congress for considerable funds to strengthen the US Armed forces

This timeline shows that america is prepareing it's self for world war two.  Nations do not go to war unprepared. 

08/01/1941

US budget includes $17,500,000,000 defence appropriation

As you can see american has been in cotact with the Bristish Government.  Discussing which of the axis powers should be defeated first.http://www.worldwar-2.net/tim...; Deshanews you need to familiiarize with world war two history.

When ever nations go to war nations have to prepare for war.  This was done even in (bush jr's war ) war in iraq. 

The US military is continuing to move men and equipment towards Iraq as the Bush administration signals that the time for diplomacy at the United Nations is fast running out. All the signs are that the military build-up could accelerate dramatically over the next few months if the US administration decides upon military action against Iraq.

Whatever may have been happening at the UN, the US military has been working to a pre-determined timeline - one that envisages a potential conflict with Iraq early in 2003http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/am...; I have just shown you two example of what is needed before nations go to war. One example is from world war two.  The other is ( Bush jr's war ) iraq war.   

As for this statement by you.  You are the people who hated Reagan for telling the Russians to "tear down this wall".  You are the ones who didn't think it was right to fight against Russians because you thought that their way of government was better than ours. 

If you are suggesting that Reagan ended the cold war you are wrong

Though the arms-race spending undoubtedly damaged the fabric of the Soviet civilian economy and society even more than it did in the United States, this had been going on for 40 years by the time Mikhail Gorbachev came to power without the slightest hint of impending doom.

Gorbachev was ready for changes in policy regardless of whether the American president was Reagan, or Kennedy, or someone even more liberal. It was clear that our military spending was enormous and we had to reduce it.

Understandably, some Russians might be reluctant to admit that they were forced to make revolutionary changes by their arch enemy, to admit that they lost the Cold War. However, on this question we don't have to rely on the opinion of any individual, Russian or American. We merely have to look at the historical facts. From the late 1940s to around the mid-1960s, it was an American policy objective to instigate the downfall of the Soviet government as well as several Eastern European regimes.http://www.counterpunch.org/b...; As the article says the cold war was ongoing for 40 years.  Don't assume that Reagan by himself ended the cold war.  This war ended by both liberal and republican presidents and there policies.

Perhaps the most dangerous myth regarding the legacy of the late President Ronald Reagan is that he was somehow responsible for the end of the Cold War.

The Soviet Union and its Communist allies in Eastern Europe collapsed primarily because their governments and economies rested upon an inherently unworkable system that would have fallen apart anyway. 

High Soviet military spending, in part as a reaction to the U.S. military buildup that began in the latter half of the Carter administration, certainly hurt the Soviet economy -- as it did (and is still doing) to ours. But the reality is that it was the people themselves who brought down the system.  http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0611-12.htm" title="http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0611-12.htm" target="_blank"http://www.commondreams.org/v...

Deshanews you also say this"You are the party of hate.  You are the party of terrorists.  You are the party of entitlement. 

So the repulbican party is not filled with hate.  Let me see if i can find some racist statmets by republicans.

Haley Barbour's CCC friends oppose black voting rights and say "...negroes should not even be labeled as being in the same "nation" as Whites, much less should they be given any voting rights..." CCC writer George Crane (http://www.cofcc.org/articles.htm" title="http://www.cofcc.org/articles.htm" target="_blank"http://www.cofcc.org/articles...).

it is absurd to allow females to sit on juries in our courts," and "There were no females in the Continental Congress and I don't believe any were necessary." CCC writer George Crane (http://www.cofcc.org/articles.htm" title="http://www.cofcc.org/articles.htm" target="_blank"http://www.cofcc.org/articles...).

As a young broadcaster in the 1970s, Limbaugh once told a black caller: "Take that bone out of your nose and call me back." A decade ago, after becoming nationally syndicated, he mused on the air: "Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?" http://www.fair.org/articles/limbaugh-col or.html" title="http://www.fair.org/articles/limbaugh-col or.html" target="_blank"http://www.fair.org/articles/...

In 1992, on his now-defunct TV show, Limbaugh expressed his ire when Spike Lee urged that black schoolchildren get off from school to see his film Malcolm X: "Spike, if you're going to do that, let's complete the education experience. You should tell them that they should loot the theater, and then blow it up on their way out." http://www.fair.org/articles/limbaugh-col or.html" title="http://www.fair.org/articles/limbaugh-col or.html" target="_blank"http://www.fair.org/articles/...

George Bush became president only through the disenfranchisement of black voters in Florida. At least 120,000 mostly black voters were deprived of their right to vote in a state that has a history of disenfranchising black votershttp://www.clubs.psu.edu/club...

Senate majority leader Trent Lott of Mississippi won’t be majority leader much longer. Controversy continues to rage over Lott’s observation, uttered during a toast at Senator Strom Thurmond’s 100th-birthday party and broadcast live on C-SPAN, that "if the rest of the country" had followed Mississippi’s lead in voting for Thurmond during his 1948 run for president on a segregationist platform, "we wouldn’t have had all these problems over all these years, either."http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/ editorial/documents/02598 574.htm

How is the democrats the party of terrorrist.  Did Democrats say this to the american people." Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." Bush jr

This is old information for those who don't know. America people  were aware of assassination attempts by the terrorrist.  This info is old news,  Oct 17,2002.

"He allegedly told them about one plan to use snipers to kill U.S. senators on a golf course, sources said. The snipers, Trabelsi allegedly said, were trained to shoot at targets from between 50 meters and 250 meters, or between 160 feet and 820 feet."http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews /shooting_terrorlink02101 7.html

I personally like how the conservatives attached that a terrorrist attack will be triggered by an assassination of some politcan.  The goverment already said the terrorrist will attempt to disrute the elections.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5269-2003 Nov21?language=printer" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A5269-2003 Nov21?language=printer" target="_blank"http://www.washingtonpost.com... Is this the attack the government is refering too? So if a terrorrist attack&nb sp;was to happen with out a sucessful assassinat ion as the trigger.   What would that mean? But I will attempt to proj ect some answer s that would be used by administration before the administration uses it? First outco me= The government is going to catch someone say he was the assassin. Then they will say assassin led us to the other terrorrist involved in the operation. This stoping the attack.  Second out come=  Terrorrist attack happens, but assassintion attempt was sto p by law enforcement.  Third outcome= successful assassintion but no terrorrist attack.  The assassin was caught, the led agents to other terrorrists right in the nick of time before the terrorrist exucted there attack. 

Fourth outcome=  The&n bsp;Condoleezza Rice answer

May 2002

Condoleezza Rice: "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile." http://www.rotten.com/library/crime/terrori sm/terror-tactics/kamikaz e-jet-hijacking." title="http://www.rotten.com/library/crime/terrori sm/terror-tactics/kamikaz e-jet-hijacking." target="_blank"http://www.rotten.com/library... This is the more likely answer the administration would use if any attack was to happen?

This is old news the terrorrist are planing assassinatio n attempts on polictains.  Any successful assassination on any politican is consider as a major attack.  Who else would the terrorrist try and assassinate an abortion doctor? 

I wrote about killings in america in previous blog.  More American's have been killed by other cause rather than in a terrorrist attack.http://www.tblog.com/template...;static=249805&search =jesusisangry

Deshanews has attack Spymaster.  But once again deshanews has not posted the entire story on why spymaster said that deshanews. So once again I have to take the initiative to locate the blog.  The blog is CarteBlanche blog.http://www.tblog.com/template...;static=255041 You can read the blog to get the story.

Deshanews was the first person to relpy on this blog. Then spymaster reply to deshanews comments.

deshanews Monday 08.09.04 [3:47 pm]

You people crack me up. You are up in arms about some guy from Texas who hasn't even spent a million and yet you have nothing to say for George Soros who has spent millions and millions to smear and slander Bush.

You, my friend, are the definition of a hypocrit

SpyMaster Monday 08.09.04 [10:47 pm]

Reply to: deshanews
You're the definition of an asshole with your head up Rush Limbaugh's ass! LOL

Talk about hypocrite.

As another Tblogger said about you:

POT.KETTLE.BLACK! lol

SpyMaster Monday 08.09.04 [10:47 pm]

Reply to: deshanews
Bush doesn't need George Soros to slander him. The AWOL Drunkard & Deserter and War Criminal is a fucking piece of shit who does his own job of showing the world his asshole

Now as we all can see deshanews initiated the personal at tack first.  Deshanews says that you people crack me up.  I must assume that he is refering to " you people " as what he calls the liberocrat Socialists.

Deshanews comment was specfically designed to get some liberal or how he calls them ( a liberal liberocrat socialist ) all mad at deshanews. Then the angry liberocrat solicalist will insult des hanews.  Then deshanews could have what he wanted a crazy message from someone so he could post his crazy message of the day blog.  And deshanews admits it "In the first comment, Spy was upset because I called him out (rightfully so) on the fact that Liberocrat Socialists have much more money being spent on slandering Bush than do the Republicans have making ads against Kerry. "

If deshanews is going to pass judgement on spymaster, and only supplies his readers with a certain amount of information. Naturally the reader will  agree with him.  Therefore once again, I have to supply the readers with the entire blog and comments so the reader can have all the facts instead of just what deshanews provides.

I must admit deshanews you supplied more info on your crazy message of day 08/09/2004 then you did on your previous crazy message of the day post,

But once again Deshanews you make a mistake. I shall point it out to you. Deshanews you says this.

Our winner today authored both of these masterpieces....SPYMASTER.  Spy is probably one of my favorite liberocrat socialists on the board.  Of course, Spymaster, CarteBlanche, Newbie and Checkitout are all the same exact person.

Deshanews that kind of crazy to say that all these people are the same person.  If I wanted to I could say the exact same thing.  That Deshanews, Reducto, Noguru's, Stepdad, defensor are all the same person.  But I don't proof to prove my case, all I have is speculation and so do you on your call that they are all the same person.   I personally, think deshanews wants to think that all of accused is the same person.  Deshawnes says all of the accused is the same person. This makeing it easier for deshanews to dis-credit their views.  If you can dis-credit accused&n bsp;views as a group. You stand a better chance of people seeing your view.  It's alot harder to dis-credit the accused view on an individual basis. That's the way I look at, I may be wrong, and I may be right, just thought you should know.

    & nbsp;   &n bsp;   &nb sp;   &nbs p;     ;         & nbsp;   &n bsp;   &nb sp;   &nbs p;     ;   http://www.corp.direct.ca/trinity/eagle.html" title="http://www.corp.direct.ca/trinity/eagle.html" target="_blank"http://www.corp.direct.ca/tri...

http://www.kids-teens.org/Monthly_Pic/amazing_p hoto.htm" title="http://www.kids-teens.org/Monthly_Pic/amazing_p hoto.htm" target="_blank"http://www.kids-teens.org/Mon...

http://www.spiritual-endeavors.org/giftshop/jesus/jesus.htm" title="http://www.spiritual-endeavors.org/giftshop/jesus/jesus.htm" target="_blank"http://www.spiritual-endeavor...

On August 6, 2004 new terror alerts in New York and Washington was raised. This date August 6,2004 was one week after the DNC. On August 6th poll results came out to see if Kerry had a bounce by the DNC.  I remember watching the media and alot of attention was given to kerry and his poll numbers,  Then all of sudden there was a breaking news update,  Tom Ridge was raseing the terrorr alerts in Washington and New York.  Could this have been done by the Bush administration to show the americ an people that bush was still the war president and to get the ameican people  focus off Kerry's DNC election bounce.  Then the this story came out " senior U.S. intelligence official told NBC News that the information was found on a laptop computer seized from Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan, also known as Abu Talha, an al-Qaida operative who was captured last month in Pakistan in a CIA-Pakistani operation. "http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5569979/

The Bush administration says that these computer files showed specfic targets.

But there is a catch.  The so called liberal media network did not follow up this story. 

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - The al-Qaida suspect named by U.S. officials as the source of information that led to this week’s terrorist alerts was working undercover, Pakistani intelligence sources said Friday, putting an end to the sting operation and forcing Pakistan to hide the man in a secret location.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5...

A Pakistani intelligence source told Reuters on Friday that Khan, who was arrested in Lahore secretly last month, had been actively cooperating with intelligence agents to help catch al-Qaida operatives when his name appeared in U.S. newspapers.

Monday evening, after Khan’s name appeared, Pakistani officials moved him to a secret location.

“After his capture [in July], he admitted being an al-Qaida member and agreed to send e-mails to his contacts,” a Pakistani intelligence source told Reuters. “He sent encoded e-mails and received encoded replies. He’s a great hacker, and even the U.S. agents said he was a computer whizhttp://www.abovetopsecret.com...

Experts taken by surprise
Intelligence and security experts said they were surprised that Washington would reveal information that could expose the name of a source during an ongoing law enforcement operation.

“If it’s true that the Americans have unintentionally revealed the identity of another nation’s intelligence agent, who appears to be working in the good of all of us, that is not only a fundamental intelligence flaw. It’s also a monumental foreign relations blunder,” security expert Paul Beaver, a former publisher of Jane’s Defense Weekly, told Reuters.

Kevin Rosser, a security expert at the London-based consultancy Control Risks Group, said such a disclosure was a risk that came with staging public alerts but that authorities were supposed to take special care not to ruin ongoing operations.

“When these public announcements are made, they have to be supported with some evidence, and in addition to creating public anxiety and fatigue, you can risk revealing sources and methods of sensitive operations,” he said.http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5...

This story is amazeing.  The bush administration raises the terror alerts on the same day John kerrys poll numbers come out after the DNC.  The Bush administration says then have done this because of recent information and was not done to remind the american people that bush is the anti-terrorr president.  But the Bush people tell the world the source of the info.  The source ends up being a spy on the America's side.  The bush administration just reveils to the enemy that the Americans has infiltrated the al-qeda network, and have gain access to future terro r plans.  Now the enemy is changeing the recuritment polices and which member of the network will have access to senstive information.  This shall go down as one of the greatest intelligence blunders of all time.    & nbsp;

I learned about Jim Titor time traveler at work.  A co-worker was telling me that Jim Titor came back in time to get an IBM computer  While in our time Jim Titor left messages on web sites telling people about the future.  But was this a hoax or phropet or an actual time traveler?  Here is some examples.

15 November 2000 14:41

The first "leg" of my trip was from 2036 to 1975. After two VGL checks, the divergance was estimated at about 2.5% (from my 2036). I was "sent" to get an IBM computer system called the 5100. It was one the first portable computers made and it has the ability to read the older IBM programming langages in addition to APL and Basic. We need they system to "debug" various lagacy computer programs in 2036. UNIX has a problem in 2038 But while in our time he left messages telling us about our future?  Is it a hoax or is it truth? 

November 2000 13:59

On my world line, it is known that the 5100 series is capable of reading all the IBM code written before the widespread use of APL and Basic. Unfortunately, there are none left that anyone can find on my world line.

07 November 2000 21:23

pamela: 6.what started the war? and who fought in it? who won?what countries were destroyed and what survived?
timetravel_0: Wow...that's a big question. There is a civil war in the United States that starts in 2005. That conflict flares up and down for 10 years. In 2015, Russia launches a nuclear strike against the major cities in the United States (which is the "other side" of the civil war from my perspective), China and Europe . The United States counter attacks. The US cities are destroyed along with the AFE (American Federal Empire)...thus we (in the country) won. The European Union and China were also destroyed. Russia is now our largest trading partner and the Capitol of the US was moved to Omaha Nebraska .

11 November 2000 18:56

(Let me guess, you are here NOW to look at the unusual hung election we have going on. Or maybe this is the trigger event in the comming world wide econmic meltdown? Some other piviot point in history? Fess up. Why now?)
I would use the word "elections" a bit cautiously. Perhaps its easier now to see a civil war in your future?

12 November 2000 16:41

I am here for personal reasons. For a few months now, I have bee trying to alert anyone that would listen to the possibility of a civil war in the United States in 2005.

21 November 2000 10:41

My first experience with war came when I joined a shotgun infantry unit at the age of thirteen. In the 4 years I served as a “rebel”, I watched hundreds of people get shot, burn and bleed to death. I know exactly where I was and every detail of the exact moment the first nuclear warheads began falling on Jacksonville.

26 November 2000 16:32

(Can you tell us exactly what event started the war? Is there any way we can stop it?) The war is a result of faulty politics and desparation from Western leadership during the US civil war. Yes, I suppose you could stop

John Titor On Politics And Government.

07 November 2000 21:23

pamela: 21. do you still have the current form of government, presidents and vice presidents like we do?
timetravel_0: No. The Constitution was changed after the war. We have 5 presidents that are voted in and out on different term periods. The vice president is the president of the senate and they are voted separately.

15 November 2000 14:20

It is a mistake to give anyone your unwavering belief...but you will find that out yourself in 2005.

12 November 2000 16:41

I am curious… will anyone be upset if Florida’s votes are not counted in the Electoral College because of the current “confusion”?

21 November 2000 10:41

While you sit by and watch your Constitution being torn away from you, you willfully eat poisoned food, buy manufactured products no one needs and turn an uncaring eye away from millions of people suffering and dying all around you.

25 November 2000 14:03

My world line is not unified under a single government but I would say it is closer to a unified purpose. Isn’t that what you want anyway?

26 November 2000 16:32

(Can you tell us exactly what event started the war? Is there any way we can stop it?) The war is a result of faulty politics and desparation from Western leadership during the US civil war. Yes, I suppose you could stop it.

26 November 2000 16:32

(Are some states or countries safer than others?)
Take a close look at the county by county voting map from the last elections.

13 December 2000 12:44

(How and why do the Arabs Jews become entangled in the civil war of the U.S.A?)
They are not directly involved but political situations are dependant on Western stability, which collapses in 2005.

09 January 2001 09:28

((…and who are those involved with breathing life into this supposed NWO, that many people in our current world-line are so afraid of?))
On my worldline, we are no longer afraid of the “NWO”. Are you afraid of Nazis?

09 January 2001 09:28

The reason the job of President was split into an office of 5 has 4 main reasons. With 5, foreign policy is more consistent, power shifting between parties has less of an impact on the overall government, individual strengths between presidents add to the strength of the overall office, and one president is elected for each major area in the United States.

09 January 2001 09:28

The office of President is far more diluted and decentralized than it is here. The powers of the national government are more defined and reside more at the county and state level.

09 January 2001 09:28

I think the new government is good. However, since the concept of nationally subsidized welfare is gone, most people here may not appreciate it.

09 January 2001 09:28

The new US capitol is in Omaha Nebraska.

09 January 2001 09:28

The voting for individual candidates is on a rotating schedule

11 January 2001 09:04

However, if I understand you, you’re asking about death on my worldline. Yes, it is more a part of our lives than it is yours (at least for now) and capitol punishment is a reality.

26 January 2001 13:32

After the war, the United States had split into five separate regions based on the various factors and military objectives they each had. There was a great deal of anger directed toward the Federal government and a revival of states rights was becoming paramount. However, in their attempt to create an economic form of government, the political and military leaders at the time decided to hold one last Constitutional Congress in order to present a psychological cohesion from the old system. During this Congress, the leaders discovered and decided that coming up with a new and better form of government was nearly impossible. The original Constitution itself was not the problem it was the ignorance of the people that lived under it.

26 January 2001 13:32

The original Constitution itself was not the problem it was the ignorance of the people that lived under it.

26 January 2001 13:32

((Second, do you not like your "new" Constitution? Or feel that it is not as effective as the original?))
From my viewpoint, it’s very effective. I am a very strong believer in local or state’s rights.

John Titor On Our Time.

21 November 2000 10:41

For a change, I have a question for all of you. I want you to think…think very hard. What major disaster was expected and prepared for in the last year and a half that never happened?

21 November 2000 10:41

On my world line, life is not easy. We live in a world recovering from years of war, poison, destruction and hate. All of it, courtesy of the thinking and actions of people that live right now in the same world you do, worrying about which stocks to buy or whether or not a stranger is lying to them on the internet.

21 November 2000 10:41

While you sit by and watch your Constitution being torn away from you, you willfully eat poisoned food, buy manufactured products no one needs and turn an uncaring eye away from millions of people suffering and dying all around you.

25 November 2000 14:03

I have tried to tell people about CJD disease and it seems to be “catching on” in Europe.

November 2000 16:32

1 Do not eat or use products from any animal that is fed and eats parts of its own dead.
2 Do not kiss or have intimate relations with anyone you do not know.
3 Learn basic sanitation and water purification.
4 Be comfortable around firearms. Learn to shoot and clean a gun.
5 Get a good first aid kit and learn to use it.
6 Find 5 people within 100 miles that you trust with your life and stay in contact with them.
7 Get a copy of the US Constitution and read it.
8 Eat less.
9 Get a bicycle and two sets of spare tires. Ride it 10 miles a week.
10 Consider what you would bring with you if you had to leave your home in 10 min. and never return.

26 November 2000 16:32

(Are some states or countries safer than others?)
Take a close look at the county by county voting map from the last elections.

06 December 2000 21:36

I would characterize the intolerance you have here as a result of ignorance and fear. I have observed that people with unfounded and irrational fears about their fellow man in this time have the luxury of not having their beliefs tested.

30 December 2000 13:37

As far as evidence goes…I have however decided to try an experiment with you that may be more convincing. It involves the travel of information at faster than light. In fact, I have dropped at least three little gems like this that no one else has picked up on.

31 December 2000 11:00

Well...you're getting closer people. Here's another one I found today. Again, I apologize for taking up this much space but I thought you'de want to see this. http://www.observer.co.uk/life/story/0" title="http://www.observer.co.uk/life/story/0" target="_blank"http://www.observer.co.uk/lif...,6903,416412,00.html Science 2001

17 January 2001 11:29

I believe your society is biologically geared for self-destruction. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/john_titor_war.html" title="http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/john_titor_war.html" target="_blank"http://www.abovetopsecret.com...

Sounds horrible does'nt it.  But if you really look at America current political system and the ideology of both parties. I kind of see what Jim is saying.

Americans attack and kill gays,  We kill aborition docotors, we riot in when we dissapprove of others views.  The performer in vegas when she said this song goes out to michael moore.  The audience got all mad and started destorying the hotel, and not one conservative leader denounce's this act of violence. Allowing this type of mild violence commited againist the opposition is not look down upon by the leaders. Why of the leadership allow this, if the opposeing moderates see any kind of violence or intinidation done to them by the others, it becomes in there self interest not to voice your opposeing views.  Both parties followers don't practice tolerance towards one another views.  Look at John Kerry speechs.  Bush supporters show up and disrupt the speech, chanting and useing bull horn saying four more years.  At bush speechs I don't hear about type of disruption going on there.  The closest thing to a disruption at bush speechs is the reporters asking questions. We eat animals that are being feed other animals,  orignic food is hard to come across.  Americans still practice racism againist one another, no interracial marriages or dateing.  I can point out a few more things that I see is wrong with america,  At one point in our history amercans were very tolerant towards one another views. Americans blame the social problems in american on groups who share a common ideology. " The breakdown of the family is something that we cannot afford in this country. The society is not built to have a culture in which families don't exist. We can't afford it, economically or culturally or socially. And so, this is not an issue of being against anybody, but it's being for something that is an intrinsic good for society that must be maintained" When every anything goes wrong blame is allready been placed on minority groups with in america. Outsourceing good paying america jobs, Liberal side, There a thousands of good jobs in america conservative side. Let foreign nationals into america to do the jobs americans won't do, conservative side, If the good paying jobs leave america and the foreigners take the jobs that americans won't do what kind of jobs will be left in america?

Now we commit violent acts againist each other, harm can be inflicted physically and mentally. I personally feel if Bush wins the election by rigging the votes.  Those who rig the votes for bush, can also rig the votes for members of congress.  If you really think about a republican house and  with 60 or more republicans holding the senate.  I use 60 becasue 60 is considered the supermajority inorder to break democratic filabusters.  The conservative ideology will be free to what it choses to the american people or those to oppose there views.  If this was to happen? Then in my eyes these are the intial steps towards a civil war? Democracy has failed when politcans rig the votes.  For me as a cynical person I can relate to what Jim Tator says.

I am cynical but I am also logical call it a logical cynicist.  What I find odd is that jim does not mention, 9/11 or war in iraq or afgan, in his posting.  For me this where the hoax theory comes in.  If Jim was really a time traveler from our future why would Jim not warn america about 9/11 and wars in iraq and afgan?  His messages and dates are early 2001 and most of 2000.  Why would'nt jim tell america about these two things that right now is very important in american life.  Jim did not mention won wins the 2004 election?  Could it be a hoax or jim did not know that these events would take place in America.  Maybe these events must happen inorder for what jim says is to happen.  9/11 happened, patriot acts started, Americans lost some rights. Most american don't even know what rights they lost? 

So I can see an american citzens loseing some rights can place a negitive view of their own government.  But will this view be enough to start a civil war?  What else did jim leave out. This oil crisis that we are in now,  The war in sudan,what about the north koreans they possess nuclear weapons, none of this mentioned by jim?  But why?  If Jim was really a time traveler maybe these events which we are experencing is nothing compared to civil war that starts in 2005?  

But the logical side of me tells me this is a hoax.

Time Travellers Need IBM 5100 Computers!

From 2000-2001, John Titor claimed to be a time traveller sent form 2036 to 1975 to fetch an IBM 5100 in order to solve problems with legacy software in 2036 (before Unix systems fail in 2038). He stopped in 2000 to warn us of a civil war that would start in the US in 2005 and culminate in World War III in 2015. He claimed that there was some special hidden feature in the 5100:

In 2036, it was discovered (or at least known after testing) that the 5100 computer was capable of reading and changing all of the legacy code written by IBM before the release of that system and still be able to create new code in APL and basic.

If you have 5100 computers that you'd like to contribute to his cause, I don't know how you can get them to him. On the other hand, I'm still trying to find a working A or C model 5100 (with APL), or any 5100 model (working or not) for spare parts. My 5100 model C1 has a bad APL ROS module. Here is Jim Tator link if you want to read it.